Цитата:https://bkrs.info/slovo.php?ch=得
2) глагольный инфикс, выражающий возможность совершения действия
生水喝不得 [shēngshuĭ hēbude] - сырую воду пить нельзя
他走得动 [tā zŏudedòng] - он в состоянии идти
我买得起 [wŏ măideqĭ] - я в состоянии [могу] купить
听懂 я понимаю (по речи) I understand (by speech)
听得懂 я могу понимать (по речи) I can understand (by speech)
всё, что он говорит, я понимаю.
Actually it is just 听懂. But this situation is obviously about ability, so you can also say 听得懂.
Адов, can I ask some more?
Is using 能 with +得懂 considered good grammar? For instance, 能听得懂,能看得懂。I see it used but it's something we're usually taught not to use.
Also is there any difference between 能听懂 and 听得懂?
2017.02.11r1 Адов, can I ask some more?
Is using 能 with +得懂 considered good grammar? For instance, 能听得懂,能看得懂。I see it used but it's something we're usually taught not to use.
2017.02.11r1 Is using 能 with +得懂 considered good grammar? For instance, 能听得懂,能看得懂。I see it used but it's something we're usually taught not to use.
I will say it is not good grammar, because 能听懂 (can understand) or 听得懂 (can understand) is enough, 能听得懂 (can be able to understand) is superfluous.
2017.02.11r1 Also is there any difference between 能听懂 and 听得懂?
In this case, they are the same.
你能听懂中文嗎﹖and 你听得懂中文嗎?have no difference.
你能看懂中文嗎﹖and 你看得懂中文嗎?have no difference.
But for me if a sentence has мочь, I will surely translate as 能, and if a sentence has 能, I will surely translate as мочь. Otherwise, I may not include the word мочь/能.
I have to stress In this case, because 能(_)懂 may not be in every case = (_)得懂. And very often the meaning is the same, but the feeling is not right, or the habit of the language is not that.
Of course if we are saying correct/wrong 能听得懂 (can + be able to understand) is not wrong. But here it is the case of good/bad (as r1 asks about good grammar). Just like wearing an unfit coat is not wrong, but not good. In our school classes, usually we have 病句改正 exercise, and in many cases we are asked to remove what is superfluous.